bio age
Β· Zi Wang Β· 1 min read
Z / Runner ππ»ββοΈ
ππ»ββοΈ <3 the "that's our strava, oura, reju oly'".
We know what to measure (brain, muscle, microbiome, epigenetic, aging-pace), but we can't measure it. So the hard question is how do we build a system that gives everyday people access to the signals that matter, when the signals are locked behind invasive procedures and expensive sequencing? What is the AI-native, accessible proxy for these "mission impossible" biomarkers?
ππ»ββοΈ product hypothesis: build ai-native proxies for inaccessible biomarkers. Core problem: the highest-signal biomarkers of aging cannot be measured by normal people (csf proteomics, skeletal muscle transcriptomics, microbiome sequencing, methylation patternsβ¦), BUT, day-to-day behaviors are accessible, movement, sleep, diet. MAYBE, ai can reconstrucut the trajectory of "impossible biomarkers" by stitching together the everyday signals.
voice + cognition patterns β brain age slope. Csf [cerebrospinal fluid] clock track changes in brain-specific proteins, hardest to measure, but ai agent can track and approximate speech speed, memory recall, reaction time, focus driftβ¦ to create longitudinal curve to approx' csf aging.strength curve + recovery curve β muscular transcriptomic aging. No biopsy, use fitness outputs such as rep, loaded weights, gait variance, mobility degradation, stability under load, force output, soreness patterns map out muscle age.diet behavior + postprandial response β microbiome aging. Capture daily food intake, use CGM to infer microbial diversity.sleep + stress + exercise β epigenetic aging slope. Enough wearables to correlate methylation drift, use sleep scores, HRV, resting heart rate, weight, BMI, training load as a strong proxy.
ππ»ββοΈ my product hunch: a daily ai "peer", collect routine behavior patterns, give a "loose" proxy score for aging velocity. This maybe our Whoop recovery score, a strava for longevity.
ππ»ββοΈ PDF files (drive link).
Stephen / Basketball π
π open source of calculating biological age (methyl groups' placement on dna)? can the metric of life expectancy be more exciting instead? brain / neurological age / duneid aging pace / skeletal muscle / microbiome / cardiorespiratory (vo2max) / healthspan escape velocity / ..? that's our strava (vs rejuvenation olympics or oura circles)!
43.6 - 34.9 = 8.7 or 20.0% for zi, 46.8 - 46.4 = 0.40 or 0.86% for stephen, 35.5 - 33.1 = 2.40 or 6.77% for aaron, 42.6 - 28.8 = 13.8 or 32.4%the science of super longevity(morgan levine at altos labs); an epigenetic clock analysis.
π muscle gain hugely depends on the optimal amount of protein. how to experiment on your individual amount more accurately and scientifically? what's the _% difference in the effectiveness of natural food, protein bars (EPG + sucralose), protein powders?
z, export the full notes from attia? intake distribution, don layman. (already posted in full? optimal intake, 299 luc van loon.).aaron's workout logvs aaron's research on protein, best powder, best bar. KING of all protein bar is David.